Association between Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Periodontal Diseases.

Gingivitis and periodontitis are chronic inflammatory diseases that affect the supporting tissues of the teeth. Although induced by the presence of bacterial biofilms, other factor, such as tobacco smoking, drugs, and various systemic diseases, are known to influence their pathogenesis. Diabetes mellitus and periodontal diseases correspond to inflammatory diseases that have pathogenic mechanisms in common, with the involvement of pro-inflammatory mediators. A bidirectional relationship between type 2 diabetes and periodontitis has been documented in several studies. Significantly less studies have focused on the association between periodontal disease and type 1 diabetes. The aim of the study is to analyze the association between periodontal status and type 1 diabetes mellitus. The "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines" was used and registered at PROSPERO. The search strategy included electronic databases from 2012 to 2021 and was performed by two independent reviewers. According to our results, we found one article about the risk of periodontal diseases in type 1 diabetes mellitus subjects; four about glycemic control; two about oral hygiene; and eight about pro-inflammatory cytokines. Most of the studies confirm the association between type 1 diabetes mellitus and periodontal diseases. The prevalence and severity of PD was higher in DM1 patients when compared to healthy subjects.

Study of Prevalence, Severity and Risk Factors of Periodontal Disease in a Portuguese Population.

Periodontal disease is a common worldwide oral inflammation/infection affecting tissues that surround and support teeth. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence, extent and severity of periodontal diseases and its risk factors, according to the most recent periodontal classification, in an adult population of Northern Portugal. This observational study collected data from clinical records of patients who attended the University Clinic of Gandra between April 2021 and April 2022. Of a total of 941 patients included, 457 (48.6%) had periodontitis, 253 (26.9%) had gingivitis and the remaining 231 (24.5%) were healthy patients. The prevalence of stage III severe periodontitis was 51.2%, more prevalent in males, and in the age group of 61-70 years. Gingivitis was more prevalent in females, and in the age group of 31-40 years; in both diseases, the most prevalent extension was the generalized one. Using a binary logistic regression, we observe a significant relation of the risk of periodontitis with age (p = 0.019; OR 1.033; 95% CI 1.005-1.062), tooth brushing (p = 0.002; OR 0.25; 95% CI 0.105-0.599) and dental flossing (p = 0.015; OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.09-0.768). This study revealed a high prevalence of periodontitis. Increased age, lack of tooth brushing and flossing were identified as potential risk factors for periodontitis in the investigated Portuguese population.

Effects of Different Undersizing Site Preparations on Implant Stability.

As immediate loading protocols are becoming more frequent, the primary stability of implants has become an essential criterion for the osseointegration of dental implants. Based on this, the objective of this study was to understand the influence of different undersized surgical preparation sites on the insertion torque (IT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ). Four different site-preparation protocols were performed on fresh humid type III bovine bone: one control, the standard protocol recommended by the manufacturer (P1), and three variations of undersized techniques (P2, P3 and P4). The implant used was VEGA by Klockner Implant System. The sample size was n = 40 for each of the four groups. A torquemeter was used to measure the IT, and the ISQ was measured with a Penguin RFA. Both variables showed a tendency to increase as the preparation technique was reduced, although not all the values were statistically significant (p < 0.05) when comparing with the standard preparation. The preparations without a cortical drill, P2 and P4, showed better results than those with a cortical drill. Given the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that reducing the implant preparation can increase both the IT and ISQ. Removing the cortical drill is an effective method for increasing implant stability, although it should be used carefully.

Review of the Mechanical Behavior of Different Implant-Abutment Connections.

Introduction: Different implant-abutment connections have been developed to reduce mechanical and biological failure. The most frequent complications are loss of preload, screw loosening, abutment or implant fracture, deformations at the different interfaces, and bacterial microleakage. Aim: To review the evidence indicating whether the implant-abutment connection type is significant regarding the following issues: (1) maintenance of the preload in static and dynamic in vitro studies; (2) assessment of possible deformations at the implant-abutment interfaces, after repeated application of the tightening torque; (3) evaluation of the sealing capability of different implant connections against microleakage. Materials and Methods: In June 2020, an electronic literature search was performed in Medline, EBSCO host, and PubMed databases. The search was focused on the ability of different implant connections to maintain preload, resist deformation after tightening and retightening, and prevent microleakage. The related titles and abstracts available in English were screened, and the articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected for full-text reading. Results: The literature search conducted for this review initially resulted in 68 articles, among which 19 articles and 1 systematic review fulfilled the criteria for inclusion. The studies were divided according to the three proposed objectives, with some studies falling into more than one category (maintenance of preload, surface abutment-implant deformation, and resistance to microleakage). Conclusions: Conical abutment appears to result in fewer mechanical complications, such as screw loosening or fractures, and higher torque preservation. After SEM evaluation, damage was observed in the threads of the abutment screws, before and after loading in internal and external connections. Internal hexagon implants and predominantly internal conical (Morse taper) implants showed less microleakage in dynamic loading conditions. We suggest further studies to guarantee excellence in methodological quality.

Is It Possible to Monitor Implant Stability on a Prosthetic Abutment? An In Vitro Resonance Frequency Analysis.

In order to apply the "one-abutment-one-time" concept, we evaluated the possibility of measuring resonance frequency analysis (RFA) on the abutment. This trial aimed to compare the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) values obtained by the PenguinRFA when screwing the transducer onto the implant or onto abutments with different heights and angulations. Eighty implants (VEGA®, Klockner Implant System, SOADCO, Les Escaldes, Andorra) were inserted into fresh bovine ribs. The groups were composed of 20 implants, 12 mm in length, with two diameters (3.5 and 4 mm). Five different abutments for screwed retained restorations (Permanent®) were placed as follows: straight with 1, 2, and 3 mm heights, and angulated at 18° with 2 and 3 mm heights. The mean value of the ISQ measured directly on the implant was 75.72 ± 4.37. The mean value of the ISQ registered over straight abutments was 79.5 ± 8.50, 76.12 ± 6.63, and 71.42 ± 6.86 for 1, 2, and 3 mm height abutments. The mean ISQ over angled abutments of 2 and 3 mm heights were 68.74 ± 4.68 and 64.51 ± 4.53 respectively. The present study demonstrates that, when the ISQ is registered over the straight abutments of 2 and 3 mm heights, the values decrease, and values are lower for angled, 3 mm height abutments.

In vitro comparative analysis of two resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell implant stability coefficient and Penguin resonance frequency analysis.

Adequate implant stability is an essential requirement. The introduction of the Penguin resonance frequency analysis raises some questions regarding its reliability, reproducibility, and repeatability as well as how it compares to the older Osstell device. PURPOSE: To assess the newer Penguin implant stability coefficient (ISQ) device (vs the Osstell device). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 implants were used, divided into four groups (A, B, C, and D) (according to design) and placed in fresh bovine bone. Consecutive measurements were made with both devices (Penguin/Osstell) with their respective transducers. Then, the ISQ values were measured with the Penguin device using the Osstell transducer, and vice-versa. RESULTS: The mean insertion torque (N/cm) values for the implants were as follows: Group A = 24.7 ± 9.4; Group B = 25.6 ± 9.7; Group C = 28.7 ± 7.9; Group D = 19.1 ± 5.5. The mean ISQ values for the entire sample were as follows: Penguin 67.7 ± 6.1 and Osstell 68.5 ± 9.6. The ISQ value measured with the Penguin device using a SmartPeg transducer was 67.0 ± 8.0, and that for the Osstell device using a MultiPeg transducer was 68.3 ± 7.5. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for the ISQ values obtained from both devices and was >0.90 for all transducers. When the ICC transducers were interchanged, the values were <0.77. CONCLUSIONS: Both ISQ devices allow for reliable and repeatable measurement of implant stability; however, the use of each device-specific transducer is recommended.

Repeatability of the resonance frequency analysis values in implants with a new technology

Background: Assess the reliability (by means of reproducibility and repeatability) of the PenguinRFA system, analyse the ISQ values of different implant types and correlate the ISQ with the insertion torque during the placement of the implant. Material and Methods: 120 rough surface implants were placed in bovine bone (type II and III). The implants were divided into groups, according to its design. Once the implants were in place, the exact insertion torque was registered. Then, primary stability was measured by means of the resonance frequency analysis with the PenguinRFA and the Osstell ISQ devices. In each implant two transducers of each device were used. Three measurements were obtained with each transducer. Results: The mean ISQ (implant stability quotient) of the whole sample is 67,70 ± 5,51. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is 0,933 and 0,944 for transducers 1 and 2 respectively. The reproducibility is 0,906. The mean insertion torque is 24,54 ± 8,96N. The correlation between the ISQ and the insertion torque is 0,507 p < 0,000 (MultiPeg 1) and 0,468 p < 0,000 (MultiPeg 2) for bone type II and 0,533 p < 0,801 (MultiPeg 1) and 0,193 p < 0,140 (MultiPeg 2) for bone type III

No disponible